NANDLAL SHARMA CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. ITO(EXEMPTION), KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that even if the benefit of Section 11 is not granted due to delayed filing, the expenditure incurred for charitable purposes should be allowed to be set off against gross receipts. For AY 2019-20, the return was filed within the due date, making the assessee eligible for the exemption.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, filed its return of income for AY 2018-19 beyond the due date, leading to the denial of deduction for application of funds. For AY 2019-20, the return was filed before the extended due date, but the deduction was still denied.
What were the issues?
Whether expenditure incurred for charitable purposes should be allowed as a set-off against gross receipts even if the trust is not eligible for exemption under Section 11 due to delayed filing. Whether the assessee was eligible for exemption under Section 11 for AY 2019-20.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 11,Section 12A,Section 139(1),Section 250,Section 143(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI SANJAY GARG, HON’BLE & DR. MANISH BORAD, HON’BLE
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
The above captioned appeals are directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (hereinafter ‘the ld. CIT(A)’), Kolkata, passed u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter ‘the Act’), dt. 29/04/2022, for the Assessment Year 2018- 19 and Assessment Year 2019-20; respectively.
We first take up ITA No. 356/Kol/2023 for adjudication.
Though the assessee has raised various grounds of appeal but the sole grievance of the assessee is that the CPC erred in not giving the deduction of the amount applied during the year at Rs.5,94,448/-.
We have heard rival contentions and perused the material available on record. We notice that the assessee is a charitable trust. Due date of filing the return for Assessment Year 2018-19 is & Nandlal Sharma Charitable Trust 30/09/2018. Assessing filed the return of income on 30/10/2018 and the same was delayed. This fact is not disputed. During the year the gross receipts of the assessee were Rs.6,05,000/- and Rs.5,94,448/-, was applied for charitable purposes. Since the assessee did not file the return of income before the due date, assessee was not eligible for exemption u/s 11 of the Act. The CPC in its intimation dated 21/05/2019, denied the same and made the addition of Rs.5,94,448/-. The plea of the ld. Counsel for the assessee is that even if the assessee is not considered as a charitable trust for the purpose of completing the assessment for the year under appeal, the expenditure claimed during the year ought to have been allowed against the gross receipts.
We find merit in the contention of the assessee and as has been held consistently by various Hon’ble Courts, that even in case benefit of Section 11, is not granted to the assessee and it is not deemed to be registered under section 12A of the Act, even then for that particular year the expenditure incurred during the year should be allowed to be set off against the gross receipts. We, therefore, are inclined to hold that the assessee deserves set off of Rs.5,94,448/-being the expenditure incurred during the year and the same is well supported by the audit report filed for the year. Thus, appeal of the assessee for Assessment Year 2018-19 is allowed as per the terms indicated hereinabove.
Now we take up ITA No. 357/Kol/2023, wherein also similar issue has raised and against the gross receipts of Rs.2,42,500/-, assessee has incurred expenditure of Rs.2,40,920/-towards charitable purposes and the same has not been allowed to the assessee on the & Nandlal Sharma Charitable Trust ground that return of income has been filed beyond the due date of filing of return. We, however, after considering the submissions of the ld. Counsel for the assessee notice that in the intimation u/s 143(1) of the Act for Assessment Year 2019-20, the system itself indicates that the date for filing of original return of income was extended to 31/10/2019. Further we find that the assessee filed return of income on 30/10/2019, which was well before the due date. Therefore, the ground on which the CPC has denied the benefit of application of fund to the assessee is in itself invalid. Therefore, since the assessee has filed return of income before the due date provided u/s 139(1) of the Act, the assessee is eligible to claim benefit of Section 11 of the Act being a registered trust u/s 12A of the Act. Thus, the impugned addition is deleted and the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed.
In the result, both these appeals of the assessee are allowed. Order pronounced in the Court on 6th September, 2023 at Kolkata. (SANJAY GARG) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Kolkata, Dated 06/09/2023 *SC SrPs & Nandlal Sharma Charitable Trust आदेश क" "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ" / The Appellant
""यथ" / The Respondent 3. संबंिधत आयकर आयु" / Concerned Pr. CIT 4. आयकर आयु" अपील ( ) / The CIT(A)- 5. िवभागीय "ितिनिध ,आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, कोलकाता/DR,ITAT, Kolkata, 6. गाड" फाई/ Guard file.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026