SH. HARGOPAL BANSAL,BATHINDA vs. THE INCOMEA-TAX OFFICER, BATHINDA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessees to withdraw their appeals. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal of these appeals.
What were the facts?
Multiple assessees filed applications for withdrawal of their appeals before the ITAT. The reason for withdrawal was that the assessees had availed the Vivad se Vishwas scheme and received Form No. 3/5 under the scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether appeals can be withdrawn by assessees who have opted for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme and received the relevant certificates.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (4 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT:
All these appeals by the different assessees are directed against the separate orders of different Ld. Commissioners of Income Tax (Appeal) at various stations as per following details:
Sl.No. Appeal No. Name of Case CIT(Appeal / s ) Order dt. 1. Shri Hargopal Bansal CIT(A)-, Bathinda 31/03/2014 2. Bharat Milk Products CIT(A)-, Bathinda 22/05/2018 3. ITA No. 484/ASR/2019 Smr. Urmila Kumari CIT(A)-, Bathinda 13/05/2019 4. ITA No. 524/ASR/2019 Smt. Sudha Aggarwal CIT(A)-5, Ludhiana 30/05/2019 5. ITA No. 727/ASR/2019 Kashif Naseem Qureshi CIT(A)-1, Jalandhar 21/10/2019
In all the above appeals the Ld. Counsels for the Assessee or Assessees themselves furnished separate applications for withdrawal of the appeals.
During the course of hearing the Ld. Counsels for the Assessees submitted that since the assessees have availed the immunity scheme i.e; Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has issued Form No. 3 / 5, in response to the applications filed by the assessees, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore the appeals of the assessees may be allowed to be withdrawn. The details of above said certificates are as under:
Sl.No. Appeal No. Name of Case Certificate No. 1. Shri Hargopal Bansal 727628880181120 2. Bharat Milk Products 865940580221220 3. ITA No. 484/ASR/2019 Smr. Urmila Kumari 793901020081220
The Ld. DR did not object if the above appeals of the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above the appeals of the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeals of the assessees are dismissed.
Order pronounced on 21/01/2021
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026