GULAB CHAND PANDEY,BILASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3), BILASPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee accepted the assessment order and prayed for withdrawal of the appeal, with no objection from the Revenue. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263(1) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2014-15. Subsequently, the assessee accepted the revised assessment order and sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal against the revision order under section 263(1) should be dismissed as withdrawn after accepting the subsequent assessment order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, HONBLE & SHRI N.K. CHOUDHRY, HON’BLE
PER N.K. CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER
This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 20/03/2019 impugned herein passed by the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax [for short, ‘ld. Commissioner], Bilaspur u/sec. 263(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") for the A.Y. 2014-15. (Gulab Chand Pandey)
In this case, the Assessee has accepted the assessment order dated 27/11/2019 passed u/sec. 143(3) read with section 263 of the Act in pursuance to the impugned order dated 20/03/2019 and prayed for withdrawal of the appeal. Ld.DR has not raised any objection.
Considering the prayer of the Assessee and no objection of the Revenue Department, the Assessee’s appeal is liable to be dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed as withdrawn. Order Pronounced in open Court on this 29th day of July, 2021. (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) Judicial Member
Dated: 29th July, 2021. vr/- (Gulab Chand Pandey) Copy to:
The Assessee - Gulab Chand Pandey, Mata Choura, Gali No.5, Kududand, Bilaspur (CG)
The Revenue – ITO-2(3), Bilaspur.
Ld. Pr.CIT-1,Bilaspur.
The D.R., Raipur.
Guard file. By order
Sr. Private Secretary, ITAT, Raipur (on tour).
More judgments on Section 263(1)
- Kailashbai Manubhai Kahor, Rajkot vs The Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 347/RJT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Mohammed Afzal & Bros, Ahmedabad vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 1159/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Measage.Osaka Alloys and Steel (P) Ltd… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 347/ASR/2019[2013-14]Status: Disposed20 Feb 2026AY 2013-14
- Aahana Sales Private Limited, Ahmedabad vs PCIT(Central), AhmedabadITA 878/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2025AY 2018-19
- Yashwantrao Chavan Maharashtra Open… vs Commissioner of Income Tax, -Exemption, PuneITA 1386/PUN/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed11 Aug 2025AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kavya Shrivastava vs. Hdfc Bank LTD.Madhya Pradesh · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Gaurav Jewellers Through Proprietor Gaurav Barjatiya vs. Branch Manager Yes Bank LTD.Madhya Pradesh · 15 Oct 2026
- Kavya Shrivastava vs. State Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 15 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026