MOGLINEEDI VENKATESWARA RAO,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), VIJAYAWADA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 217/VIZ/2019Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam01 February 2021AY 2009-103 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had filed Form No.3 under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, which leads to the withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order. During the hearing, the assessee submitted a letter stating they had opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Act and received a certificate in Form No.3.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 4(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM

Before: SHRI N.K.CHOUDHRY, HON’BLE & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, HON’BLE

Hearing: 29.01.2021Pronounced: 01.02.2021

O R D E R

Per D.S.Sunder Singh, Accountant Member :

1.

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], Vijayawada in Appeal No.103/CIT(A)/VJA/15-16 dated 14.02.2019 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2009-10.

Mogilineedi Venkateswara Rao, Vijayawada

2.

When this appeal is taken up for hearing, the assessee has filed a letter stating that the assessee preferred an application u/sec. 4(2) of Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and the Principal Commissioner (Central), Visakhapatnam was pleased to issue a Certificate in Form No.3 on 30.12.2020. The assessee further stated that once Form No.3 is issued by the Pr. Commissioner, the appeal shall be deemed to have been withdrawn from the date on which Form No.3 is filed, however, he submitted that appeal may be recalled in case the certificate issued by the Pr. Commissioner is withdrawn at a future date due to any unforeseen contingencies.

3.

Ld.DR has not raised any objection.

4.

We have heard both the sides and gone through the Form No.3 and also gone through the withdrawal petition filed by the assessee. We find that in this case Form No.3 is issued by the Pr.Commissioner and the assessee has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal as withdrawn, however, with a rider that in any case the certificate issued by the Pr.Commissioner is withdrawn at a future date for any reason, it is open to the assessee to file an appropriate

Mogilineedi Venkateswara Rao, Vijayawada application before the Tribunal. In that event, the order passed by the Tribunal would be recalled in accordance with law. 5. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 1st February, 2021.

Sd/- Sd/- (एन के चौिरी ) (धड.एस .सुन्दर धसंह) (N.K.CHOUDHRY) (D.S.SUNDER SINGH) न्याधयक सदस्य / JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सदस्य /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated : 01.02.2021 L.Rama, SPS आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतषि/Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. तिर्धाररिी/ The Assessee– Mogilineedi Venkateswara Rao, G-6, Vandana Apartment, Pydaiah Street, Labbipet, Vijayawada 2. रधजस्व/The Revenue – Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(2), Vijayawada 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Vijayawada 4. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Vijayawada 5. तवभधगीय प्रतितितर्, आयकर अिीिीय अतर्करण, तवशधखधिटणम/DR, ITAT, Visakhapatnam 6.गधर्ाफ़धईि / Guard file आदेशधिुसधर / BY ORDER // True Copy //

Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Visakhapatnam

More judgments on Section 4(2)

All 87 judgments and leading authorities on Section 4(2) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →