K. SURYANARAYANA,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ADDL. CIT, VISAKHAPATNAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal to be dismissed as withdrawn. The assessee was granted liberty to seek recall of the order if unforeseen circumstances arise.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A). During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee opted for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. The Income Tax Department issued Form No. 3 in response to the assessee's application under the scheme.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI N.K. CHOUDHRY, HON’BLE & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, HONBLE
Per N.K. Choudhry, Judicial Member:
This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 19/06/2015 impugned herein passed by the ld.CIT(A)-1, Visakhapatnam u/sec. 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") for the A.Y. 2007-08.
The assessee has preferred an application under consideration dated 08/02/2021 for withdrawal of the appeal.
During the course of hearing, ld. counsel for the assessee has submitted that since assessee has availed the immunity
2 (Dr. K. Suryanarayana) scheme i.e. Vivad Se Vishwas under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 and the Income Tax Department has issued Form No.3, dated 10/12/2020 in response to the application filed by the assessee under the scheme, therefore appeal of the assessee may be allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek recall of the order in case any unforeseen circumstances would arise in future.
The Ld. DR raised no objection, if the appeal of the assessee is allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn.
Having heard both the parties and perused the application for withdrawal of the appeal and Form No.3 (Copy already on record) issued by the Department. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the appeal of assessee is liable to be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek recall of the order as prayed for in accordance with law, hence ordered accordingly.
In the result, appeal of the assessee stands dismissed as withdrawn. Order Pronounced in open Court on this 03rd day of March, 2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026