SHRI ANIL KUMAR KEWLANI,KATNI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, JABALPUR
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessees to withdraw their appeals as they had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2019. This settlement meant the appeals were no longer maintainable.
What were the facts?
The assessees, belonging to the Kewlani family, had filed appeals against assessments made under section 147 read with section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act for AY 2011-12. These assessments followed a search under section 132(1).
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the appeals after the assessees opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, which resolves tax disputes.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH,
Before: SH. SANJAY ARORA, HONBLE
Anil Kumar Kewlani & Ors. v. Dy. CIT Per Sanjay Arora, AM This is a set of eight appeals by different assessees belonging to a family (Kewlani family) challenging the dismissal of their appeals contesting their assessments under section 147 read with sec. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) for assessment year 2011-12, i.e., consequent to a search under section 132(1) of the Act, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Bhopal (‘CIT(A)’ for short) vide his separate Orders dated 25/11/2019 (in the case of Manisha Kewlani) and 28/11/2019 (in other cases). The facts and circumstances of the appeals being the same, as well as the same raising similar issues, the appeals were fixed for hearing together, and are being disposed of per a common order for the sake of convenience.
At the very outset, it was submitted by the ld. counsel for the assessee/s, Shri Bardia, that the assessee/s has opted for ‘Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2019’, depositing the requisite tax thereunder with the Central Government. In fact, in all cases, the settlement of dispute has led to a refund to the assessee toward which the requisite certificate under The Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 (‘DTVsV Act’) read with the relevant Rule, i.e., Form 3, since received, is also enclosed along with the withdrawal application/s. The assessee/s, thus, does not intend to prosecute his/her captioned appeal/s, and, accordingly, prays for withdrawing the same. The ld. Sr. DR, Ms. Aggarwal, did not have any objection to the assessee/s withdrawing his/her appeal/s under the circumstances.
I have heard the parties. Form 3, signifying the acceptance of the assessee(s)’s application under the VsV Scheme, 2019 has been issued in all cases by the Revenue on 28/12/2020 or 29/12/2020. In view of the assessee/s having opted for availing the benefits under the DTVsV Act, he has, in principle, relinquished his rights under the appeal, which becomes Anil Kumar Kewlani & Ors. v. Dy. CIT unmaintainable under the said Act. The assessee(s)’s said appeal is, accordingly, permitted to be withdrawn. I decide accordingly.
In the result, the assessee(s)’s appeal is dismissed as withdrawn/not maintainable. Order pronounced in the Open Court on June 29, 2021 (Sanjay Arora) Accountant Member Dated: 29/06/2021 Copy of the Order forwarded to:
The Appellants: i. Shri Anil Kumar Kewlani ii. Sh. Mahesh Kewlani iii. Sh. Sandeep Kumar Kewlani iv. Smt. Jyoti Kewlani v. Smt. Manisha Devi Kewlani, vi. Smt. Sharda Devi Kewlani vii. Sh. Arvind Kumar Kewlani viii. Sh. Devraj Kewlani T-36 Karen Lines, Madhav Nagar, Katni – 483501
The Respondent: Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Jabalpur (M.P.)
The Pr. CIT (Central), Bhopal
The CIT(A)-3, Bhopal
The Sr. DR, ITAT, Jabalpur
Guard File
////
4
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026