THE KRISHNA MERCANTILE CO-OP. BANK LTD.,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 1(1), BHOPAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee was not given a proper and effective opportunity of hearing, which is not in accordance with natural justice. Therefore, the order of the CIT(A) was set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A). The assessee's counsel submitted that the CIT(A) passed a one-sided order without providing a proper opportunity of hearing.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) provided a proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee before passing the order.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आदेश 15.07.2020 को खुले �यायालय म� उ�घो�षत �कया गया है। ह�ता/- ह�ता/- (मनीष बोरड) (कुल भारत) लेखा सद�य �या�यक सद�य �दनांक : 15.07.2020 ��त�ल�प : अपीलाथ�, ��यथ�, आयकर आयु�त (अपील), आयकर आयु�त, �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, गाड� फ़ाइल
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shivaraj M S vs. The Union Of INDIAKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026