G.NARASIMHAN,COIMBATORE vs. CIT(A),NFAC, DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found no infirmity in the order of the CIT(A) which directed the Assessing Officer to refer the matter to the DVO for determining the sale consideration in accordance with law.
What were the facts?
The assessee sold a piece of land and declared capital gains of ₹.20 lakhs. The Assessing Officer invoked Section 50C, using the stamp duty valuation of ₹.67.90 lakhs to calculate capital gains. The CIT(A) directed a reference to the DVO for determining the sale consideration.
What were the issues?
Whether the Assessing Officer was justified in invoking Section 50C based on stamp duty valuation without referring to the DVO for determining the actual sale consideration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal
O R D E R
PER V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), (National Faceless Appeal Centre)[NFAC], Delhi dated 27.10.2021 relevant to the assessment year 2006-07.
Facts are, in brief, that the assessee is owner of piece of land and the same was sold on 06.07.2005 and declared ₹.20 lakhs as capital gains arising out of this transaction. The Assessing Officer applied the provisions of section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short] by stating that as per the registered document of sale showing the stamp duty valuation, the sale value was ₹.67.90 lakhs. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer calculated the capital gains based on the notional value under section 50C of the Act and not as per the value declared by the assessee. On appeal, the ld. CIT(A) directed the Assessing Officer to make a reference to the DVO and arrive the sale consideration in accordance with law.
Against the order of the ld. CIT(A), the assessee came in appeal before the Tribunal. None appeared on behalf of the assessee, despite the hearing of the appeal was adjourned various occasions. Hence, we proceed to decide the issue on merits after hearing the ld. DR.
We have heard the ld. DR, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. In this case, by invoking the provisions of section 50C of the Act, the Assessing Officer has determined the capital gains at ₹.61,70,029/- as against ₹.20,00,000/- admitted by the assessee. On appeal, the ld. CIT(A) has directed the Assessing Officer to refer the matter to DVO and decide the capital gains in accordance with law. We find no infirmity in the order passed by the ld. CIT(A) and no interference is warranted.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced on 12th April, 2023 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 50C
- M N S Barium Salts, Kadapa vs ITO, Ward-1, KadapaITA 2412/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sawalchand Chunilal Bafna HUF, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer-16(1)(1), MumbaiITA 7492/MUM/2025[2011-12]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Jagdishbhai Vasharambhai Italiya, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-3(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 150/AHD/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Rohini Ramhari Bhadale, Pune vs Assessing Officer Ward 2(2) Pune, PuneITA 2767/PUN/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Sweta Somani, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 44(2), KolkataITA 1656/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026