SHEEL CHAND AGROILS PVT. LTD.,RUDRAPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 1, HALDWANI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had exercised the option under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as infructuous.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, and submitted the necessary forms.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as infructuous due to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DEHRADUN BENCH ‘DB’, DEHRADUN
Before: Sh. Saktijit DeyDr. B. R. R. Kumar
Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(A), Haldwani dated 09.05.2017.
At the outset, it was brought to the notice of bench by the ld. DR that the assessee has filed application under the “Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act 2020” and has already submitted Form 1 & 2 and Form 3 have been issued by the designated authority.
Keeping in view the exercise of option by the assessee to opt for the scheme, the appeal of the assessee is being dismissed as infructuous.
2 Sheel Chand Agroils Pvt. Ltd.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 24/02/2023.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026
- Salman vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 26 Oct 2026
- Srilalitha Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026