MARAPPA GOUNDER SAKTHIVEL,NAMAKKAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1, NAMAKKAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) did not adjudicate the appeal on merits and may not have considered the assessee's written submissions. The matter was set aside and remanded back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to file a return of income for AY 2010-11. The AO made a best judgment assessment based on AIR information of cash deposits. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal due to non-compliance.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) properly adjudicated the appeal on merits, and if the assessee's submissions were considered.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal
O R D E R
PER V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [NFAC], Delhi dated 10.02.2023 for the assessment year 2010-11.
Brief facts of the case are that as per AIR information, the assessee made cash deposits amounting to ₹.17,86,790/- into his savings bank account during the financial year 2009-10. Since the assessee has not filed any return of income for the assessment year 2010-11, the 2 Assessing Officer issued notice under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short] since the Assessing Officer believed that the income to the extent of ₹.17,86,790/- has escaped assessment. Despite various notices issued, the assessee has neither appeared nor filed any reply. Hence, the Assessing Officer completed best judgement assessment under section 144 r.w.s. 147 of the Act dated 20.11.2018 by assessing total income of the assessee at ₹.17,86,790/-. On appeal, the ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal by inferring that the assessee was not serious to pursue its appeal since there was no compliance to the notices issued by the ld. CIT(A).
On being aggrieved against the appellate order, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the Tribunal. None appeared on behalf of the assessee, when the appeal was taken up for hearing. Hence, we proceed to decide the appeal on merits after hearing the ld. DR.
We have heard the ld. DR, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. Against the additions made by the Assessing Officer, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT(A). Despite various opportunities afforded, the assessee has not furnished any written submissions with supporting evidence to substantiate its claim. Therefore, the ld. CIT(A) dismissed the 3 appeal of the assessee and presumed that the assessee was not interested to pursue the appeal. From the appellate order, we find that the ld. CIT(A) has not adjudicated the issue raised in the appeal on merits. In the grounds of appeal, the assessee has submitted that the assessee has filed written submissions on 08.02.2023. However, it appears that the ld. CIT(A) has not considered the written submissions of the assessee and concluded his order on 10.02.2023. In view of the above, we set aside the appellate order and remit the matter back to the file of the ld. CIT(A) with a direction to adjudicate the issue on merits by affording one more opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to furnish complete details with material evidence before the ld. CIT(A) for consideration.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026