KARUPPAUDAIYAR SELLAMUTHU,SALEM vs. ITO,WARD-1(9), SALEM

PDF · subscribers
ITA 163/CHNY/2023Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 June 2023AY 2017-183 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matters to the Assessing Officer for de novo assessment and penalty proceedings. This was granted on the condition of the assessee paying a cost of Rs. 10,000/-.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeals arose from ex-parte assessment and penalty orders. The assessee had not appeared before the lower authorities despite opportunities.

What were the issues?

Whether ex-parte assessment and penalty orders should be set aside and remanded to provide the assessee with an opportunity to be heard, adhering to principles of natural justice.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 144,Section 271AAC

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI

Before: SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL & SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS

Hearing: 22.06.2023Pronounced: 23.06.2023

Heard together (2 matters)

ITA No.163/Chny/2023
ITA No.164/Chny/2023

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

Appeal Centre (NFAC) Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 02-12-2022 in the matter of assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] under section 144 of the Act on 02-12-2019 and penalty levied u/s 271AAC vide order dated 06-08-2021.

2.

The Ld. AR, at the outset, submitted that quantum assessment orders as well as penalty orders passed by lower authorities are ex- parte orders. Accordingly, Ld. AR sought remand of impugned matters to Ld. AO so that the assessee could substantiate his claim before the Ld. AO. The Ld. Sr. DR submitted that the assessee remained negligent in attending any of the proceedings.

3.

The Bench observed that the assessee did not appear before the lower authorities despite being given sufficient opportunities. However, the Bench accept the submission of Ld. AR by observing that after all the orders of the lower authorities are ex-parte orders and keeping in mind the principle of natural justice, the assessee be provided with another opportunity of hearing. Therefore, the impugned orders are set-aside. However, this concession would come upon payment of cost of Rs. 10,000/-. The same shall be paid by the assessee to Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority at Hon’ble High Court of Madras within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order. The & 164/Chny/2023 :- 3 -:

receipt / proof shall be furnished by the assessee in due course to Ld. AO who shall proceed to reframe the assessment and consequential penalty de novo after affording opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Ordered accordingly.

4.

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on 23rd June, 2023.

More judgments on Section 271AAC

All 982 judgments and leading authorities on Section 271AAC →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →