TS KUMARASAMY,THIRUCHENGODU vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal decided to correct the name of the Appellant's representative in the cause title. The name is to be read as Mr. R. Gopala Kannan, Advocate.
What were the facts?
This judgment is a corrigendum to a previous order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench. It corrects the name of the Appellant's representative in the cause title of the appeals.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was a clerical error in the cause title of the appeals regarding the Appellant's representative's name.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
order dated 07th July, 2023, in TO 905/Chny/2022 and ITA Nos. 872 TO 879/Chny/2022, the Appellant’s Representative name mentioned in the cause title is to be read as Mr. R. Gopala Kannan, Advocate instead of Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan, Advocate.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
