VISHAN GUNNA,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE INT. TAX 1(3)(1), NEW DELHI, INCOME TAX
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the jurisdiction was transferred from one AO to another without a mandatory order under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the assessment order passed by the AO without proper jurisdiction was quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a non-resident, filed her return of income claiming exemptions. The Assessing Officer (AO) passed a final assessment order after DRP directions. The assessee appealed, raising grounds including jurisdictional issues.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment order is valid when jurisdiction was transferred between Assessing Officers without a Section 127 order. Whether the AO had the territorial jurisdiction to assess the non-resident assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “D” BENCH: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM : The present appeal is filed by the assessee against the assessment order dated 17.10.2023 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] after giving effct to the directions of Ld. Dispute Resolution Panel (“Ld. DRP”) dated 31.08.2023 for AY 2021-22. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a non-resident and filed her return of income, declaring total income of INR 9,99,370/- after claiming exemption u/s 54F & 54EC of the Act.
The case of the assessee was taken up for scrutiny by way of issue of notice u/s 143(2) dated 27.06.2022 by the ACIT/DCIT, Circle International Taxation-1(1)(1), Delhi. There
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 127
- Radhakishan Potharajula, Karim Nagar vs ITO (Int Taxn)-2, HyderabadITA 2340/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Kishor Kumar Aggarwal, Gurgaon vs ACIT-Central Circle-30- Delhi., DelhiITA 2305/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Kishor Kumar Aggarwal, Gurgaon vs ACIT-Central Circle-30, DelhiITA 2304/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Chenna Narayana Chakka, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward 6(1), HyderabadITA 1944/HYD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Chenna Narayana Chakka, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward-6(1), HyderabadITA 1943/HYD/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026