SH.KARAMJIT SINGH,KAPURTHALA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER KAPURTHALA-1, KAPURTHALA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessees to withdraw their appeals. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal, and the appeals were accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
Several assessees filed appeals before the ITAT. During the hearing, the assessees' counsels sought to withdraw these appeals. The reason for withdrawal was that the assessees had availed the Vivad se Vishwas scheme and received relevant certificates from the Income Tax Department.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessees could withdraw their appeals after opting for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme and receiving the necessary certificates.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (6 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेश आदेश/Order आदेश आदेश
PER BENCH:
All these appeals by the different assessees are directed against the separate orders of different Ld. Commissioners of Income Tax (Appeal) at various stations as per following details:
Sl.No. Appeal No. Name of Case CIT(Appeal / s ) Order dt. 1. Dr. G.B. Singh CIT(A)-2, Jalandhar 12/04/2016 2. ITA No. 164/Asr/2017 Sh. Gurmanjit Singh CIT(A)-2, Jalandhar 05/01/2017 3. Karamjit Singh CIT(A)-2, Jalandhar 29/11/2018 4. ITA No. 418/Asr/2019 Amardeep Singh CIT(A)-2, Jalandhar 11/04/2019 Makkar ITA No. 575/Asr/2017 5. Shri Balwinder Singh CIT(A)-2, Jalandhar 04/07/2017 ITA No. 656/Asr/2019 6. Shri Vasdev CIT(A)-2, Amritsar 03/10/2019
In all the above appeals the assessees / Ld. Counsels for the Assessees furnished separate applications for withdrawal of the appeals.
During the course of hearing the Ld. Counsels for the Assessees submitted that since the assessees have availed the immunity scheme i.e.; Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has since issued Form No. 3 / 4, in response to the applications filed by the assessees, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore the appeals of the assessees may be allowed to be withdrawn. The details of above said certificates are as under:
Sl.No. Appeal No. Name of Case Certificate No.
ITA No. 297/Asr/2016 Dr. G.B. Singh 236511900020221 2. Sh. Gurmanjit Singh 974584500311220 3. Karamjit Singh 273618200250221 4. ITA No. 418/Asr/2019 Amardeep Singh 132441100080121 Makkar ITA No. 575/Asr/2017 5. Shri Balwinder Singh 246302450090221 ITA No. 656/Asr/2019 6. Shri Vasdev 339107840080421
The Ld. DR did not object if the above appeals of the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above the appeals of the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeals of the assessees are dismissed.
Order pronounced on 29/04/2021.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026