M. PADMAVATHI,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(4), VISAKHAPATNAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that upon issuance of Form No. 3, the appeal is deemed withdrawn. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. Subsequently, the assessee applied under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and received a certificate in Form No. 3 from the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI N.K.CHOUDHRY, HON’BLE & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, HON’BLE
O R D E R
Per D.S.Sunder Singh, Accountant Member :
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]-2, Guntur in ITA.No.10098/GNT/CIT(A)-2/2013-14 dated 30.09.2019 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2007-08.
When this appeal is taken up for hearing, the Ld.AR has filed a letter stating that the assessee preferred an application u/sec. 4(2) of Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I Visakhapatnam was pleased to issue a Certificate in Form No.3 on 22.02.2021. Form No.3 is a certificate issued under sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 by the Pr.CIT, determining the total tax payable by the assessee in response to the application made by the assessee under the scheme. The assessee further stated that once Form No.3 is issued by the Pr. Commissioner, the appeal shall be deemed to have been withdrawn from the date on which Form No.3 is filed, however, he submitted that appeal may be recalled in case the certificate issued by the Pr. Commissioner is withdrawn at a future date due to any unforeseen contingencies.
Ld.DR has not raised any objection.
We have heard both the parties and gone through the Form No.3 and also gone through the withdrawal petition filed by the assessee. We find that in this case Form No.3 is issued by the Pr.Commissioner and the assessee has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal as withdrawn, however, with a rider that in any case the certificate issued by the Pr.Commissioner is withdrawn at a future date for any reason, it is open to the assessee to file an appropriate application before the Tribunal. In that event, the order passed by the Tribunal would be recalled in accordance with law.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 1st April, 2021.
Sd/- Sd/- (एन के चौिरी ) (धड.एस .सुन्दर धसंह) (N.K.CHOUDHRY) (D.S.SUNDER SINGH) न्याधयक सदस्य / JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सदस्य /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated : 01 .04.2021 L.Rama, SPS आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतषि/Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. तिर्धाररिी/ The Assessee– M.Padmavathi, Flat No.501, Advaitha Kuteeram Apts., Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam 2. रधजस्व/The Revenue – Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(4), Visakhapatnam 3. The Pr.Commissioner of Inco me Tax-1, Visakhapatnam 4. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Guntur 5. तवभधगीय प्रतितितर्, आयकर अिीिीय अतर्करण, तवशधखधिटणम/DR, ITAT, Visakhapatnam 6.गधर्ाफ़धईि / Guard file आदेशधिुसधर / BY ORDER // True Copy //
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Visakhapatnam
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026