HANUMAN DHALL WORKING COMPANY,VINUKONDA vs. ITO, WARD-1, NARASARAOPET

PDF · subscribers
ITA 19/VIZ/2018Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam01 April 2021AY 2010-113 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had obtained a certificate under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act and requested to withdraw the appeal. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order. The assessee later filed an application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and received a certificate from the Principal Commissioner. The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM

Before: SHRI N.K.CHOUDHRY, HON’BLE & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, HON’BLE

Hearing: 29.03.2021

O R D E R

Per D.S.Sunder Singh, Accountant Member :

1.

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]-1, Guntur in dated 28.12.2017 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2010-11.

M/s Hanuman Dall Working Company, Vinukonda

2.

When this appeal is taken up for hearing, it is observed that the assessee has filed a letter stating that the assessee preferred an application u/sec. 4(2) of Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Vijayawada was pleased to issue a Certificate in Form No.3 on 22.01.2021. Form No.3 is a certificate issued under sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 by the Pr.CIT, determining the total tax payable by the assessee in response to the application made by the assessee under the scheme. The assessee further stated that once Form No.3 is issued by the Pr. Commissioner, the appeal shall be deemed to have been withdrawn from the date on which Form No.3 is filed, however, he submitted that appeal may be recalled in case the certificate issued by the Pr.Commissioner is withdrawn at a future date due to any unforeseen contingencies.

3.

Ld.DR has not raised any objection.

4.

We have heard the Ld.DR and gone through the Form No.3 and also gone through the withdrawal petition filed by the assessee. We find that in this case Form No.3 is issued by the Pr.Commissioner and the assessee has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal as withdrawn, however, with a rider that in any case the M/s Hanuman Dall Working Company, Vinukonda certificate issued by the Pr.Commissioner is withdrawn at a future date for any reason, it is open to the assessee to file an appropriate application before the Tribunal. In that event, the order passed by the Tribunal would be recalled in accordance with law.

5.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in the open court on 1st April, 2021.

Sd/- Sd/- (एन के चौिरी ) (धड.एस .सुन्दर धसंह) (N.K.CHOUDHRY) (D.S.SUNDER SINGH) न्याधयक सदस्य / JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सदस्य /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated : 01 .04.2021 L.Rama, SPS आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतषि/Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. तिर्धाररिी/ The Assessee – M/s Hanuman Dall Working Company, D.No.222A & 222B, Vittamrajupalle, Vinukonda 2. रधजस्व/The Revenue – Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Narsaraopet 3. The Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax , Vijayawada 4. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Guntur 5. तवभधगीय प्रतितितर्, आयकर अिीिीय अतर्करण, तवशधखधिटणम/DR, ITAT, Visakhapatnam 6.गधर्ाफ़धईि / Guard file आदेशधिुसधर / BY ORDER // True Copy //

Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Visakhapatnam

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →