SHRI VARINDER KUMAR SAREEN,NAWANSHAHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NAWANSHSHAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessees to withdraw their appeals. The Departmental Representative did not object to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
Multiple assessees filed appeals before the ITAT. During the hearing, the assessees' counsels applied for withdrawal of the appeals. The reason for withdrawal was that the assessees had availed the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and received Form No. 3 under the scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals can be withdrawn by the assessees after availing the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (9 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेश आदेश/Order आदेश आदेश
PER BENCH:
All these appeals by the different assessees are directed against the separate orders of different Ld. Commissioners of Income Tax (Appeal) at various stations as per following details:
Sl.No. Appeal No. Name of Case CIT(Appeal / s ) Order dt. 1. Shri Manik Anand CIT(A)-2, Amritsar 02.03.2015 2. ITA No. 574/ASR/2018 M/s B.L. Mehta Projects P. CIT(A), Bathinda 12.09.2018 Ltd. 3. ITA No. 302/ASR/2016 Shri Naresh Puri CIT(A)-2, Amritsar 02.03.2016 4. ITA No. 557/ASR/2017 Shri Naresh Puri CIT(A)-2, Amritsar 14.06.2017
Shri Varinder Kumar 6. CIT(A)-1, Jalandhar 28.03.2018
In all the above appeals the Ld. Counsels for the Assessees furnished separate applications for withdrawal of the appeals.
During the course of hearing the Ld. Counsels for the Assessees submitted that since the assessees have availed the immunity scheme i.e; Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has since issued Form No. 3, in response to the applications filed by the assessees, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore the appeals of the assessees may be allowed to be withdrawn. The details of above said certificates are as under:
Sl.No. Appeal No. Name of Case Certificate No. 1. Shri Manik Anand 340849500130421 2. ITA No. 574/ASR/2018 M/s B.L. Mehta Projects P. 237284580020221 Ltd. 3. ITA No. 302/ASR/2016 Shri Naresh Puri 233366170300121 4. ITA No. 557/ASR/2017 Shri Naresh Puri 213231530150121
6. Shri Varinder Kumar 265793630160221
The Ld. DR did not object if the above appeals of the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above the appeals of the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeals of the assessees are dismissed.
Order pronounced on 22/06/2021.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026