A.VARALAKSHMI,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(4), VIJAYAWADA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal to be dismissed as withdrawn. The assessee was granted liberty to seek recall of the order if unforeseen circumstances arose.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee availed the Vivad se Vishwas scheme and received Form No. 3 from the Income Tax Department. The assessee then applied for withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee after opting for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI N.K. CHOUDHRY, HON’BLE & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, HONBLE
Assessee by : Shri G.V.N. Hari, Advocate. Department by : Smt. Suman Malik, Sr.DR Date of hearing : 28/04/2021. Date of pronouncement : 05/05/2021. O R D E R Per N.K. Choudhry, Judicial Member:
This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 22/07/2019 impugned herein passed by the ld.Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [for short, “ld.Commissioner”], Vijayawada, u/sec. 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") for the A.Y. 2008-09.
The assessee has preferred an application under consideration dated 09/04/2021 for withdrawal of the appeal.
2 (Smt. Annabhatula Varalakshmi) 3. During the course of hearing, ld. counsel for the assessee has submitted that since assessee has availed the immunity scheme i.e. Vivad Se Vishwas under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 and the Income Tax Department has issued Form No.3, dated 08/04/2021 in response to the application filed by the assessee under the scheme, therefore appeal of the assessee may be allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek recall of the order in case any unforeseen circumstances would arise in future.
The Ld. DR raised no objection, if the appeal of the assessee is allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn.
Having heard both the parties and perused the application for withdrawal of the appeal and Form No.3 (Copy already on record) issued by the Department. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the appeal of assessee is liable to be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek recall of the order as prayed for in accordance with law, hence ordered accordingly.
In the result, appeal of the assessee stands dismissed as withdrawn. Order Pronounced in open Court on this 05th day of May, 2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026