SCHLUMBERGER ASIA SERVICES LTD.,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2, INTL. TAXATION, DEHRADUN
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal allowed the assessees' request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessees filed appeals before the ITAT for assessment years 2012-13 and 2013-14. They subsequently filed applications to withdraw these appeals.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeals should be withdrawn by the assessees due to their opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DEHRADUN BENCH : DEHRADUN
Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA & SHRI AMIT SHUKLA
ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM: filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 18th July, 2017 of the CIT(A)-2, Noida, relating to the assessment year 2013- 14. ITA No.6120/Del/2016 is directed against the order dated 20th September, 2016 passed by the AO u/s 144C(13) r.w. section 143(3) of the IT Act, 1961, relating to the assessment year 2012-13. For the sake of convenience, both these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
The ld. Counsel for the assessees filed two separate applications for both the years stating that the assessees seek withdrawal of the appeals on the ground that the assessees have opted to settle the disputes relating to the tax arrears for the assessment years under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The assessees have also obtained Form No.3. It was accordingly requested that the appeals may be allowed to be withdrawn.
In the absence of any objection from the ld. DR, the request of the assessees for withdrawal of the appeals is allowed. Accordingly, the appeals filed by the assessees are dismissed.
In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn. The order was pronounced in the open court on conclusion of the hearing itself, i.e., on 26th March, 2021.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026