RAVINDRA KUMAR KESARWANI,ALLAHABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(3), ALLAHABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. Since the dispute was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee wished to withdraw their appeal against a penalty order under Section 271(1)(c) for AY 2010-11. This was because the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, which covered the dispute.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ALLAHABAD BENCH ‘SMC’ ALLAHABAD
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 23.10.2019 of CIT(A) arising from penalty order passed u/s 271 (1) (c) of Act for the assessment year 2010-11.
At the time of hearing, the Ld. AR of the assessee has submitted that the assessee does not want to pursue this appeal as the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme- 2020. The Ld. AR has pointed out that the competent authority has already issued Form No. 3 which covers the dispute involved in the quantum appeal as well as present penalty appeal. The quantum appeal of the assessee was already dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 25.02.2021 in I.T. Act No. 133/Alld/2019. Thus, the Ld. AR has submitted that the present appeal of the assessee may be allowed to be 2 withdrawn. The Ld. DR has raised no objection if the present appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the fact that the assessee has already opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme – 2020 to settle the dispute for the year under consideration including the penalty levied u/s 271 (1) (c) of the Act and the designated authority has issued Form No. 3 dated 15.02.2021. The request of the assessee for withdrawal of appeal is allowed. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed being withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 15th March, 2021.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026