SMT. VIJAY LUXMI GUPTA (THROUGH LEGAL HEIR SHRI MUKESH GUPTA),ALLAHABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(4), ALLAHABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to the TDS credit as the income on which TDS was deducted was offered to tax in her hands. Denial of credit solely due to the TDS being deposited in the deceased husband's PAN was unjustified.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed TDS credit of Rs. 5,89,348/-. However, the TDS was deposited in the PAN of her deceased husband. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) denied the credit, stating the TDS was not in the assessee's name.
What were the issues?
Whether TDS credit can be denied when the income is assessed in the assessee's hands, but the TDS was mistakenly deposited in another person's PAN?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Bhooratnam & Co.48 citing357 ITR 396 · 2013 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ALLAHABAD BENCH ‘SMC’ ALLAHABAD
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 04.09.2015 of CIT(A) for the assessment year 2011-12. However, the only effective grounds are ground No. 1 to 3 which are reproduced as under:- “1. That the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred both in law while upholding the order rejecting the application u/s 154 of the Act resulting into denial of the credit of TDS of Rs. 5,89,348/- on the income declared and assessed in the hands of the assessee.
That the order u/s 154 of the Act dated 13.01.2014 is perse bad in law as without granting statutory reasonable opportunity of being heard provided u/s 154 of the Act
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026