SHRI VIPAN KUMAR OHRI,CHANDIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, GURDASPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessees had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and received the relevant certificates. The Revenue did not object to the dismissal of the appeals as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessees had filed appeals before the ITAT. During the hearing, the assessees were absent, but had submitted applications to withdraw their appeals. They stated that they had availed immunity under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and had received Form No. 3 from the department.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेश आदेश/Order आदेश आदेश
PER BENCH:
These are the appeals by the Assessee against the separate orders of different Ld. CIT(Appeals) at various stations as per following details:
Sl.No. Appeal No. Name of Case CIT(Appeal / s ) Order dt. 1. Shri Kuldip Singh CIT(A)-2, Jalandhar 28/02/2017 2. Shri Vipan Kumar Ohri CIT(A)-2, Amritsar 08/01/2020
During the course of hearing nobody was present on behalf of the assessee. However the applications have been furnished by the assessees for withdrawal of these appeals by stating there in that the assessees have availed immunity benefit under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme Act 2020 and Form No. 3 have been issued by the Department.
Ld. DR did not object if the appeals of the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the present case, it is noticed that the assessees have availed the immunity scheme i.e; Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has since issued Form No. 3/5, in response to the applications filed by the assessees, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, the details of above said certificates are as under:
Sl.No. Appeal No. Name of Case Certificate No. 1. Shri Kuldip Singh 441333560040820 2. Shri Vipan Kumar Ohri 230205950280121
In view of the above the appeals of the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeals of the assessees are dismissed.
Order pronounced on 01/09/2021
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026