SH. GURBINDER SINGH SIDHU,NAWANSHAHR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NAWANSHAHR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessees' appeals to be withdrawn. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal of the appeals.
What were the facts?
The assessees filed applications for withdrawal of their appeals before the ITAT. They had availed the Vivad se Vishwas scheme and received Form No. 3 under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn by the assessees who have opted for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आदेश/Order आदेश आदेश आदेश
PER BENCH:
All these appeals by the different assessees are directed against the separate orders of different Ld. Commissioners of Income Tax (Appeal) at various stations as per following details:
Sl.No. Appeal No. Name of Case CIT(Appeal / s ) Order dt. 1. Shri Balwinder Singh Kohli CIT(A)-1, Jalandhar 29/11/2016
2. ITA No. 83/ASR/2017 Shri Balwinder Singh Kohli CIT(A)-1, Jalandhar 29/11/2016 3. Shri Balwinder Singh Kohli CIT(A)-1, Jalandhar 29/11/2016 Shri Balwinder Singh Kohli 4. ITA No. 85/ASR/2017 CIT(A)-1, Jalandhar 29/11/2016
In all the above appeals the Ld. Counsels for the Assessees furnished separate applications for withdrawal of the appeals.
During the course of hearing the Ld. Counsels for the Assessees submitted that since the assessees have availed the immunity scheme i.e; Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has since issued Form No. 3, in response to the applications filed by the assessees, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore the appeals of the assessees may be allowed to be withdrawn. The details of above said certificates are as under:
Sl.No. Appeal No. Name of Case Certificate No. 1. Shri Balwinder Singh Kohli 220690840200121 2. ITA No. 83/ASR/2017 Shri Balwinder Singh Kohli 230695600200121 3. ITA No. 84/ASR/2017 Shri Balwinder Singh Kohli 220702070200121 4. ITA No. 85/ASR/2017 Shri Balwinder Singh Kohli 220699140200121
5. Shri Gurbinder Singh Sidhu 341952320160421
The Ld. DR did not object if the above appeals of the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above the appeals of the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeals of the assessees are dismissed.
Order pronounced on 01/09/2021.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026