M/S JEEVAN PETROLEUM,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2(2, JALANDHAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the one-day delay in filing the appeal. Subsequently, considering the assessee's application for withdrawal due to opting for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was filed one day late due to postal delays. During the hearing, the assessee requested the delay be condoned and also filed an application to withdraw the appeal, having opted for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned and whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for a dispute resolution scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
PER N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-1, Jalandhar dt. 28/12/2018.
2. Registry has pointed out that the appeal of the assessee is belated by One day and the defect memo was issued. In response to that the assessee vide application dt. 28/05/2019 submitted as under:
Re:- M/s Jeevan Petroleum (PAN: AAIFJ5998C) Suchi Pind, Bye Pass, Opp Indian Oil Depot, Jalandhar. Appeal Against Order u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 A.Y. 2015-16 Application for condemnation of delay. Respected Sirs,
That appeal order passed by CIT(A) in respect of appeal against order u/s 143(3) of the Act was received on 11.01.2019 and appeal has been filed on 13.03.2019 which has resulted in delay of one day in filing of appeal as detailed below:
Particulars Date Order of CIT(A) received on 11.01.2019 Due date of filling of appeal 12.03.2019 Date of sending of appeal through 06.03.2019 speed Post no. EP514357309IN Date of receiving documents at ITAT, Amritsar 13.03.2019 i.e. date of filling of appeal Total delay in filling of appeal after due date 1 Day
That appeal was sent through speed post on 06.03.2019 much before due date of filing of appeal before the Honourable ITAT. Delay of one day in filing the appeal has occurred because of postal delays.
3. That my affidavit conforming these facts is enclosed herewith.
Under the circumstances, I would request you to please Condon the delay of 1 day in filing of appeal since there is reasonable cause in not filing the appeal in time & oblige.
Thanking You, Yours faithfully, For Jeevan Petroleum Sd/- (Balkar Singh) Partner
During the course of hearing the Ld. Counsel for the assessee reiterated the contents of the aforesaid application and requested that the delay may be condoned.
The Ld. DR could not controvert the aforesaid contention of the Ld. Counsel for the Assessee.
After considering the submissions of both the parties and the material available on the record, I am of the view that the delay of 1 day in filing the appeal by the assessee was beyond his control. Therefore the same is condoned and the appeal is admitted.
During the course of hearing Ld. Counsel of the Assessee has furnished an application for withdrawal of this appeal stating therein as under:
Re: Application for withdrawal of appeal in the case of Jeevan Petroleum PAN: AAIFJ5998C-AY 2015-16 Sir, With reference to above, I hereby withdraw appeal with Acknowledgment no ITA 180/ASR/2019 Since I have received DTVSV Form no. 3. Copy enclosed You are requested to please issue certificate of withdrawal of appeal so that further action can be taken. Thanking you, Yours faithfully, Sd/- Sukhwinder Kaur Bal
In the present case, it is noticed that the assessee has availed the immunity scheme i.e; Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has since issued Form 3 bearing certificate no. 132717440080121, in response to the application filed by the assessee, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore the appeal of the assessee is to be dismissed as withdrawn.
The Ld. DR did not object if appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Order pronounced on 12/11/2021)
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026