SHRI AMRINDERJIT SINGH,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX WARD-3(1), AMRITSAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, acknowledging the assessee's settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. A rider was added allowing restoration of appeals if the settlement is not resolved.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against orders passed by the Assessing Officer under Section 271(1)(c) for assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13. The assessee subsequently opted to settle these appeals under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR.
Before: SH. RAVISH SOOD & DR. M. L. MEENA
O R D E R PER BENCH The present appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the respective orders passed by the CIT(A)-1, Amritsar, which in turn arises from the respective orders passed by the Assessing Officer under Sec. 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, dated 24.05.2019 for assessment years 2011-12 to 2012- 13.
The assessee appellant had filed a letter dated 15.12.2021 wherein it is stated by him that as he has opted to settle the aforesaid appeals under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore, liberty may be granted to him to withdraw the aforesaid appeals. Copy of the “Form 5” issued by the Principal CIT- 1, Amritsar dated 30.09.2021 had been placed on our record.
The ld. D.R did not controvert the aforesaid factual position that was canvassed before us.
In view of the above, we dismiss the appeals as withdrawn, subject to a rider that in the unlikely event of the matter not being resolved under the Vivad se Page | 1 Vishwas scheme the assessee shall have liberty to approach the Tribunal for restoration of his appeals. 5. Resultantly, the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn subject to the observations recorded hereinabove. Order pronounced in the open court on 17/12/2021.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026