UMAIR AHMED,BENGALURU vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BENGALURU-3, BENGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as the grievance no longer survived after the fresh assessment order. The Revenue had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against a revisionary order passed by the PCIT under section 263. Subsequent to the revisionary order, a fresh assessment was conducted by the AO, who accepted the income as returned by the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee due to subsequent events rendering the grievance infructuous.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B’’ BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
PER KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of ld. PCIT, Bengaluru-3 dated 31.3.2025 vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/REV/F/REV5/2024-25/1075329573(1) for the assessment year 2015-16 passed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “The Act”).
At the outset, the ld. A.R. of the assessee submitted that subsequent to the revisionary order passed by the ld. PCIT, Bengaluru-3, a fresh assessment proceedings were conducted by the AO and an order u/s 143(3) of the Act was passed on 27.1.2026, wherein the AO has accepted the income as returned by the assessee. Consequently, the grievance of the assessee no longer survives and accordingly prayed to withdraw this appeal.
2.1 The ld. DR submitted that the Revenue have no objection whatsoever if the Tribunal permits to withdraw the appeal as prayed by the assessee.
Considering the application for withdrawal dated 18/03/2026 filed on 24/03/2026 as well as the request of ld. A.R. of the assessee, we permit the assessee to withdraw the appeal and accordingly appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026