SHRI NITYANAND SWETAMBER MUJRTIPURAK TAPAGACHHA JAIN SINGH,MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1981/MUM/2020Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 January 2023AY 2018-193 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal acknowledged the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was treated as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) under section 119(2)(b). The assessee subsequently filed a letter requesting the withdrawal of the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal should be granted.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 119(2)(b)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, MUMBAI

For Appellant: Shri Vimal Punmiya.AR
For Respondent: Dr. Mahesh Akhade, CIT DR
Hearing: 12.01.2023Pronounced: 13.01.2023

PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE JM:

1.

The assessee has filed the appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai passed u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act.

2.

The Ld.AR of the assessee has filed a letter dated 12.01.2023 requesting for withdrawal of the above

Shri Nityanand Swetamber Murtipujak Tapagachha Jain Sangh, Mumbai. - 2 - appeal. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is treated as withdrawn and is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 13.01.2023.

Sd/- Sd/- (BASKARAN BR) (PAVAN KUMAR GADALE) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai, Dated 13.01.2023 KRK, PS आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / The CIT(A) 4. आयकर आयु�त(अपील) / Concerned CIT �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, स�या�पत ��त //True Copy// 1. (Asst. Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai

Shri Nityanand Swetamber Murtipujak Tapagachha Jain Sangh, Mumbai. - 3 -

Initial Date 1. Draft dictated on 12.01.2023 PS 2. Draft placed before author 13.01.2023 PS

3.

Draft proposed & placed before PS the second member 4. Draft discussed/approved by PS Second Member. 5. Approved Draft comes to the PS Sr.PS/PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on 7. File sent to the Bench Clerk 8. Date on which file goes to the AR 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk. 10. Date of dispatch of Order. 11. Dictation Pad is enclosed 2. Other Member… on

More judgments on Section 119(2)(b)

All 980 judgments and leading authorities on Section 119(2)(b) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →