SWATANTRA MISHRA,GEORGE TOWN, ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD 1(5), ALLAHABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without adjudicating on the merits of the additions. The order was not in compliance with Section 250(6) as it lacked independent application of mind.
What were the facts?
The assessee's return of income was assessed under Section 144 after initiation of reassessment proceedings based on AIR information regarding cash deposits and mutual fund investments. The assessee failed to provide explanations to the AO and later to the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without considering the merits of the case and whether proper opportunity of hearing was provided.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ALLAHABAD BENCHES, ALLAHABAD
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR
PER SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal, filed by assessee, arising out of appellate order dated 23.05.2023 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) (National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC)) (DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 24/1053107065(1)-Appeal No. CIT(A), Allahabad/10251/2018-19) for assessment year 2011-12,which appeal in turn has arisen from assessment order dated 21.12.2018 passed by learned Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(5), Allahabad(hereinafter called “the AO”) u/s 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal in memo of appeal filed with Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad:- “1. That in any view of the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026