HANUMAN PRASAD AND SONS,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, RANGE 2(1), ALLAHABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A)'s order was ex-parte and that the grounds of appeal were not adjudicated in accordance with Section 250(6) of the Act. Therefore, the order was set aside, and the appeal was restored to the CIT(A) for a fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against an ex-parte order by the CIT(A). The assessee argued that notices were not received due to the Covid-19 pandemic and technical glitches, leading to a violation of natural justice. The CIT(A) allegedly reproduced the assessment order without independent reasoning.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order in violation of natural justice and failed to adjudicate the grounds of appeal as required by Section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ALLAHABAD “SMC”
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM: This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi dated 26.12.2022 for AY. 2017-18. 2. At the outset, the Ld. AR of the assessee Smt. Srishti Gupta submitted that the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) is an ex-parte order. Drawing my attention to page no. 3 of the impugned order, the Ld. AR submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) had asserted to have issued notices of hearing from 24.12.2020 to 05.09.2022, which according to her was mainly in the midst of Covid-19 Pandemic period. And during that time, according to her, it is common knowledge that there were frequent
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026