GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-3(1)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A)/NFAC failed to adjudicate the additional ground of appeal raised by the assessee. Therefore, the appeal was restored to the file of the CIT(A)/NFAC for deciding the additional ground.
What were the facts?
The assessee raised an additional ground for exemption under Section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act before the CIT(A)/NFAC, which was uploaded on the official website. While the original claim was allowed, the additional claim was not adjudicated.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A)/NFAC erred by not adjudicating an additional ground of appeal raised by the assessee regarding exemption under Section 10(38).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM & SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, AM
O R D E R
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (NFAC), Delhi dated 07.10.2022 for the assessment year 2014-15.
The only grievance of the assessee is against the action of the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC in not considering the additional ground raised by the assessee which was uploaded on the official website on 10.11.2021 (along with letter dated 08.11.2021) which fact has been acknowledged by the e-Proceedings Response Acknowledgment (refer Annex-A). In the additional ground the assessee has raised additional claim of exemption u/s 10(38) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter “the Act”) of Rs.33,16,60,530/- on account of gains arising from transfer of Long Term Capital Asset (LTCA) being listed equity shares which was chargeable to STT (over and above the General Insurance Corporation of India assessee’s claim for exemption u/s 10(38) of the Act of Rs.954,91,65,332/- in return of income). According to the Ld. AR, even though the additional ground was raised before the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC which was uploaded on 10.11.2021, the NFAC while deciding the appeal of the assessee on 07.10.2022 though granted 100% relief by allowing the claim of exemption u/s 10(38) of the Act to the tune of Rs.954,91,65,332/- did not adjudicate/examine the additional claim of Rs.33,16,60,530/-. And therefore he prayed that the Ld. CIT(A) be directed to adjudicate the additional ground of appeal raised (supra).
We have heard both the parties and perused the records. We note that the additional ground vide letter dated 08.11.2021 (supra) was uploaded by assessee in the official website of NFAC on 10.11.2021 which fact has been acknowledged by e-Proceedings Response Acknowledgment (Acknowledgment no. 806424271101121) which is found placed at page no. 5 of the P.B. By preferring the additional ground, the assessee over and above the claim of exemption u/s 10(38) of the Act in return of income (ROI) to the tune of Rs.954,91,65,332/-, the assessee claimed additional exemption of Rs.33,16,60,530/- u/s 10(38) of the Act. Even though the original claim in the rate of interest was allowed, the additional claim has not been considered by the NFAC while passing the impugned order. Therefore, we restore the appeal back to the file of the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC and direct the NFAC to decide the additional ground of General Insurance Corporation of India appeal raised by the assessee as discussed (supra) in accordance to law.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on this 31/01/2023.
More judgments on Section 10(38)
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Karan Dilipkumar Patel L/H of Late… vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Vapi…ITA 353/SRT/2024[2011-12]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Jay Patel, Raipur vs ITO, Ward-3(1), RaipurITA 684/RPR/2026[2015-16]Status: Heard12 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026