DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-30, NEW DELHI vs. SHALIMAR CORP. LTD., MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that adding the Rs. 101 crores on-money admission over and above the special auditor's quantification was a double addition and directed its deletion. Additions related to unsecured loans and unexplained investments were to be treated as business turnover and assessed at 20%.
What were the facts?
During a search, incriminating documents indicated on-money payments in real estate transactions, leading to Section 153A proceedings. The assessee admitted to Rs. 101 crores of on-money payments, which was later quantified by a special auditor. The Assessing Officer added this amount again, leading to disputes.
What were the issues?
Whether the on-money admission during search could be added again after being included in the special auditor's quantification. How to assess unsecured loans and unexplained investments derived from on-money components.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153A,Section 143(3),Section 132(4),Section 68,Section 69,Section 40A(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Indwell Constructions v. CIT188 citing232 ITR 776 · 1998 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER BENCH: The instant batch of nine appeals pertain to the same
assessee, namely, M/s. Shalimar Corp Ltd. All other relevant
details stand tabula
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026