M/S DASSAULT SYSTEMS SA,FRANCE vs. DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and filed the necessary forms. The Learned Senior DR had no objection to the withdrawal request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under Section 144C(1) r.w.s. 143(3) for the assessment year 2011-12. During the hearing, the assessee's AR requested to withdraw the appeal as the assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘FRIDAY-D’ : NEW DELHI
Asstt. Year : 2011-12 M/s Dassault Systems SA, vs. DCIT. Circle 1(2)(2), 10, rue Marcel Dassault, CS 40501, International Taxation, 78946 Velizy Villacoublay Cedex, New Delhi France Room No. 415, 4th floor, (PAN: AADCD5443N) E-2 Block, Civic Centre, New Delhi – 2 (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sh. Yishu Goel, Adv. Respondent by : Sh. Om Prakash, Sr. DR. Date of Hearing 25.07.2025 Date of Pronouncement 25.07.2025 ORDER
PER MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT :
This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order dated 13.01.2016 passed u/s. 144C(1) r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the DCIT, Circle 1(2)(2), Int. Taxation, New Delhi for the assessment year 2011-12.
At the time of hearing, Ld. AR for the assessee submitted that the assessee wishes to withdraw the appeal filed by it as assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024 (DTVSV 2024) relating to assessment year 2011-12. In this behalf, assessee has also filed Form 1 and received Form 2 from the department. Hence, it was requested that the appeal may be treated as dismissed being withdrawn.
Learned Senior DR has no objection. 4. Considering the aforesaid factual matrix, the captioned appeal is consigned to records and treated ‘dismissed’ as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 25.07.2025.
More judgments on Section 144C(1)
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Smartstream Technologies India Private… vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2220/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT-Circle 6(1)(1) Mumbai, Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7767/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- ACIT-Circle6(1)(1) Mumbai., Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7766/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026