PAN REALTORS PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-13, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the initiation of proceedings u/s 153C based on a third-party statement, where the assessee was denied cross-examination, is bad in law. The matter requires fresh examination by the AO.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed its return of income. A search operation was conducted, and incriminating documents were found. Notices u/s 153C and 143(2) were issued, and the AO assessed income higher than declared. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether proceedings initiated u/s 153C based on a third-party statement, without providing an opportunity for cross-examination to the assessee, are valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153C,Section 131,Section 68,Section 115BBE,Section 37,Section 69C,Section 139,Section 132,Section 143(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Andaman Timber Industries v. CCE1,335 citing281 CTR 241 · 2015 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘F’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA & SHRI SUDHIR PAREEK
PER SUDHIR PAREEK, JM:
The aforecaptioned appeals have been preferred by the same Assessee/Appellant against the common order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income -tax (Appeals)-26, New Delhi, ([in short (Ld.
ITA Nos.- 4767 & 4768/Del/2024 PAN Realtors Pvt. Ltd. CIT(A)] dated 23.08.2024 for the Assessment Years 2014-15 and 2015-16. Since identical issues are involved in both the appeals, they are disposed of by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience and brevity.
1 The Assessee/appellant has raised the following grounds of appeal for adjudication:
ITA No.- 4767/Del/2024
“ 1.That the proceedings initiated u/s 153 C is not o
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026