ACIT CIRCLE-1, ALLAHABAD vs. AMIT KUMAR GUPTA, ALLAHABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in deleting additions without a remand report and ignoring the fact that the assessee admitted to excess stock. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication.
What were the facts?
During a survey, undisclosed stock of gold and silver was found, and the assessee's brother admitted to it. The assessee later provided purchase bills from M/s Pushpa Enterprises and claimed receipt of gold and silver on family partition. The Assessing Officer made additions, which the CIT(A) partially deleted.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in deleting additions without a remand report and ignoring admissions of undisclosed stock found during survey. Whether the assessee's explanations regarding purchases and family partition were adequately considered.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 133A,Section 131,Section 69,Section 143(3),Section 145(3),Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD
Before: SHRI.VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI. RAMIT KOCHAR
PER SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
These cross appeals and cross objection by the assessee are directed against the order dated 30.12.2019 of CIT(A) for the assessment year 2015-16. None has appeared on behalf of the assessee when these appeals and cross objection were called
ITA Nos. 40 & 83/2020 C.O. No. 07/2020 Amit Kumar Gupta for hearing. It transpires from record that right from the beginning, nobo
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 133A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ranchhodbhai Kurjibhai Kakadiya, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 553/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Amr Infrastructures, Hyderabad vs DCIT., Central Circle-2(1), HyderabadITA 818/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Vikaskumar Macwan, Nadiad vs Dc/ACIT Central Circle 3, VadodaraITA 2022/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
