ACIT, CIRCLE-2, PATNA vs. SMT RASHMI SULTANIA, PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted that the assessee had complied with the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme, including depositing the tax. Therefore, the Revenue's appeal was treated as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 scheme and filed the necessary forms, including evidence of tax deposit. The Revenue's appeal was pending before the tribunal.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee's compliance with the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “PATNA” BENCH: PATNA
Before: Shri P. M. Jagtap, Vice-(KZ) & Shri A. T. Varkey, JM]
ORDER Per bench:
This is an appeal preferred by the Revenue against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-1, Patna dated 03.07.2019 for Assessment year 2015-16.
The assessee vide its letter submitted that she has opted for the scheme under “Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020” (hereinafter the Scheme). It has been brought to our notice that the assessee has received Form number 3 from competent authority pursuant to the assessee filing Form nos. 1 and 2 as per the Scheme. And also the assessee has filed Form No. 4 and filed along with it evidence of depositing the amount / tax as stated in Form No.
Therefore, we note that since the assessee has already deposited the tax as shown in Form NO. 3 and has filed Form No. 4 along with challan evidence payment of tax as per the Scheme, so, there is no point in keeping the departmental appeal pending. In the light of the aforesaid facts, the Ld. A.R of the assessee Shri Alok Kumar requests that the Revenue appeal be dismissed as withdrawn.
3. The Ld. D.R has no objection to the Revenue appeal being dismissed as withdrawn.
Smt. Rashmi Sultania Assessment Year: 2015-16 4. In the light of the aforesaid facts, we treat the appeal of department as withdrawn and ergo the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 1st October, 2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026