COMMERCIAL AUTO SALES PVT.LTD,ALLAHABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2, ALLAHABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the ground related to the loss on sale of vehicles as the assessee conceded it was not legally tenable. For the rent paid to the director, the Tribunal found that the CIT(A) did not comply with principles of natural justice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed rent paid to a director and loss on sale of a vehicle. The Assessing Officer made additions for these claims. The CIT(A) upheld the rent addition and the loss on sale of vehicle addition, but deleted an ad-hoc addition on new vehicle expenses.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of rent paid to a director for a camp office-cum-residence was justified, and whether the loss on sale of a vehicle was a deductible business expense.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD
Before: SHRI.VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR
PER SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal, filed by assessee, being ITA No. 17/Alld/2020, is directed against an appellate order dated 19.11.2019 in Appeal No. CIT(A), Allahabad / 10883/ 2015-16 passed by learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Allahabad(hereinafter called "the CIT(A)"),for assessment year(ay):2012-13, the appellate proceedings had arisen before learned CIT(A) from assessment order Assessment Year: 2012-13 Commercial Auto Sales Private Limited dated 31.03.2015 passed by learned Assessing Officer (hereinafter called "the AO") u/s. 143(3) of the Income
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 32(1)(iii)
- Technical Associates Limited, Lucknow vs DCIT, Range-3, LucknowITA 228/LKW/2023[AY 2015-16]Status: Disposed25 Jun 2024
- Nitrex Chemicals India Ltd., Ahmedabad vs DCIT, New DelhiITA 2860/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Jun 2023AY 2012-13
- ACIT, New Delhi vs M/S. Nitrex Chemicals India Ltd., New DelhiITA 2536/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Jun 2023AY 2012-13
- ACIT, New Delhi vs M/S. the Fertilizer Corporation of India…ITA 3357/DEL/2016[2009-10]Status: Disposed1 Jun 2023AY 2009-10
- ACIT, New Delhi vs M/S. the Fertilizer Corporation of India…ITA 3356/DEL/2016[2008-09]Status: Disposed1 Jun 2023AY 2008-09
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026