POOJA TRENDZ PVT. LTD.,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(3), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2012-13. The assessee later settled the dispute under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and received Form-3. The assessee then sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal could be withdrawn by the assessee after settling the dispute under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH, Honble & Dr.SHRI ARJUN LAL SAINI, Honble
सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of hearing: 09.02.2021 उ�घोषणा क� तार�ख/Pronouncement on: 09.02.2021 आदेश /O R D E R PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMEBER: 1. This appeal by Assessee is directed against the order of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-2, Surat dated 03.01.2017 for assessment year (AY) 2012-13.
The appeal came up hearing on 9th February 2021. The Ld. AR for the assessee submits that the assesse has settled the dispute with the under Vivad se Visvas Scheme -2020 and had already received Form-3, issued from the office of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Surat-1, dated 27.01.2021 copy of which is filed. The Ld. AR for the Pooja Trendz Pvt. Ltd., Vs. ITO, Ward-2(1)(3), Surat./ A.Y. 2012-13 assessee submits that the assessee shall pay the full and final demand as per undertaking given by assessee. The Ld. AR of assessee prayed for withdrawal of the appeal.
The ld.Departmental Representative Sr.DR appearing for the Revenue has no objection if the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Considering the submissions of the Ld. AR of the assessee, the assessee is allowed to withdraw his appeal. Resultantly, the appeal of the Assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026