WONDERFUL SILK MILLS PVT. LTD.,SURAT vs. ITO WARD-2 (1) (4), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal as the dispute was settled under the Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme. The Revenue had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2012-13. The assessee later filed an application to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee could withdraw the appeal due to settlement under a scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH, Honble & Dr.SHRI ARJUN LAL SAINI, Honble
O R D E R PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMEBER:
1. 1. This appeal by Assessee is directed against the order of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-2, Surat dated 12.05.2017 for assessment year (AY) 2012-13.
2. The appeal came up hearing on 2nd March 2021. The Ld.AR for the assessee submitted an application dated 01.03.2021 for withdrawal of the appeal on the ground that the assessee has settled dispute with the Department under Vivad-Se- Vishwas Scheme–2020 and had already received Form-3, issued from the office of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Surat-1, dated 19.12.2020 copy of which is filed. The Wonderful Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd., Vs. ITO, Ward-2(1)(4), Surat/ A.Y. 2012-13 Ld. AR for the assessee submits that the assessee shall pay the full and final demand as per undertaking given by assessee. The Ld. AR of assessee prayed for withdrawal of the appeal.
The ld.Departmental Representative (Sr.DR) appearing for the Revenue has no objection if the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Considering the submissions of the Ld. AR of the assessee, the assessee is allowed to withdraw his appeal. Resultantly, the appeal of the Assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced on 2nd March 2021 at the time of hearing of appeal.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026