SHRI PRATEEK BHAGCHANDKA,KOTA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeals as the assessee had opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. The department did not object to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) for assessment years 2012-13 to 2015-16. During the hearing, the assessee's counsel sought to withdraw these appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw appeals filed before the ITAT after opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES “B”, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI N.K. SAINI & SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 1330, 1331, 1332 & 1333/JP/2019
ORDER PER: BENCH All these appeals are filed by the assessee against the separate orders of ld. CIT(A)-2, Udaipur all dated 20/09/2019 for the A.Y. 2012-13 to 2015- 16 respectively.
The hearing of the appeals was concluded through video conference in view of the prevailing situation of Covid-19 Pandemic.
The ld. Counsel for the assessee furnished applications for withdrawal of these appeals. The common contention in the said applications read as under:
2 ITA 1330 to 1333/JP/2019_ Prateek Bhagchandka Vs DCIT “The assessee has opted Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme for AY 2012-13. As the Form -1 and Form -2 approved by the PCIT Central, Jodhpur on dated 02/09/2020 and has given the certificate in Form-3. Now the Assessee is to submit the Form-4 attaching the proof of withdrawal of appeal from ITAT. Therefore, the present application is being filed by the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal referred to above.
………………. …………….. ………………. The copy of Form-3 is also attached herewith for your reference.
It is, therefore, most humbly requested that the Assessee may kindly be permitted to withdraw the appeal and the same may please be disposed off as withdrawn.
Prayed accordingly, For Prateek Bhagchandka, Mukesh Kasera (A/R) 3. During the course of hearing the Ld. Counsel for the Assessee submitted that the assessee has availed the immunity scheme i.e. Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has since issued Form 3 bearing Certificate No. 513133040020920 for the A.Y. 2012-13, Certificate No. 513144850020920 for the A.Y. 2013-14, Certificate No. 513150830020920 for the A.Y. 2014-15 and Certificate No.
3 ITA 1330 to 1333/JP/2019_ Prateek Bhagchandka Vs DCIT 513159150020920 for the A.Y. 2015-16 in response to the applications filed by the assessee, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore the appeals of the assessee may be allowed to be withdrawn.
The Ld. DR did not object if appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 16th September, 2020.
Sd/- Sd/- ¼lanhi x®lkÃa½ ¼,u-ds-lSuh½ (SANDEEP GOSAIN) (N.K. SAINI) U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member mik/;{k@Vice President Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 16/09/2020 *Ranjan आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू vihykFkhZ@The Appellant- Shri Prateek Bhagchandka, Kota. 1. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- The D.C.I.T., Central Circle, Kota. 2. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT 3. vk;dj vk;qDr¼vihy½@The CIT(A) 4. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 5. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No. 1330 to 1333/JP/2019) 6. vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026