SMT.RESHMABEN VINODBHAI GODHANI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- 3(2)(3), SURAT
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted that the assessee had settled the dispute under the Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme and requested withdrawal of the appeal. The revenue had no objection to the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2012-13. The assessee later settled the dispute with the department under the Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal due to settlement under the Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not Applicable
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH, Honble & Dr.SHRI ARJUN LAL SAINI, Honble
PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMEBER:
This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-3, Surat hereinafter referred as “Ld.CIT(A)” dated 11.08.2017 for the assessment year (AY) 2012-13. 2. This appeal came up hearing on 13th April 2021. The assessee has already filed application dated 22.03.2021 contending therein that the assessee has settled dispute with the Department under Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme–2020 and had already received Form-3, vide Certificate No.241593130050221 issued from the office of Principal
Smt.Reshmaben Vinodbhai Godhani Vs. ITO, Ward-3(2)(3), Surat. / ITA No.203/SRT/2017 for A.Y. 2012-13 Commissioner of Income Tax, Surat-1, dated 05.02.2021 copy of which is filed. The assessee through application requested for withdrawal of appeal.
The ld.Departmental Representative /Sr.DR appearing for the Revenue has no objection if the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Considering the contents of the application filed by the assessee, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn being settled. Resultantly, the appeal of the Assessee is dismissed. The AO is directed to pass consequential order as per CBDT Circular No.3/2021 dated 04.03.2021. Order pronounced on 13th April 2021 at the time of hearing of appeal. (Dr.ARJUN LAL SAINI) (PAWAN SINGH) (लेखा सद"य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) ("याियक सद"य/JUDICIAL MEMBER) सुरत/ Surat, "दनांक Dated: 13th April 2021/#SGR Copy of order sent to- Assessee/AO/Pr. CIT/ CIT (A)/ ITAT (DR)/Guard file of ITAT. By order / // /
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026