SHRI NAVINKUMAR SHARMA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BHARUCH CIRCLE, BHARUCH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee has prayed for withdrawal of the appeals and the Revenue did not object. Consequently, the appeals were treated as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted for the benefit of the 'Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020'. The assessee filed Form No.3 under the scheme and prayed for the withdrawal of the appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals can be withdrawn by the assessee under the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH & DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI
O R D E R PER DR. A. L. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: At the outset itself, Ms Kinjal Shah, Learned Counsel for the assessee, submitted before the Bench that assessee has opted the benefit of the “Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020”. Two copies of Form No.3 under ‘the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, filed by the assessee in the Income Tax Department on 12.04.2021 and 01.04.2021 respectively, were also placed before the Bench. The assessee, by way of a letter dated 27.04.2021, submitted that he has prayed for withdrawal of the appeals to which, the learned Departmental Representative (in short “the Ld. DR”) did not raise any objection.
2 & 685/SRT/2018 AYs.2010-11 & 2012-13 Navinkumar R. Sharma 2. We have heard both the parties and gone through the Form No.3 along with Certificate No.340531210120421 for AY.2010-11 & Certificate No. 336695440010421 for AY.2012-13 are filed by the assessee to obtain the benefit of ‘Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme’ and noted that assessee has prayed for withdrawal of these appeals. The Ld. DR for the Revenue did not have any objection if these said appeals are withdrawn by the assessee. Consequently, we treat these appeals as withdrawn. The Assessing Officer is directed to pass the consequential order as per CBDT Circular No.03/2021 dated 04.03.2021.
In the result, the appeals of the assessee (in & 685/AHD/2017 for AYs.2010-11 & 2012-13) are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 29/04/2021 at the time of Virtual Court Hearing.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026