GIRISH B. AGARWAL,NARMADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(5), BHARUCH
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted that the assessee had settled the dispute under the Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme and requested withdrawal of the appeal. The Revenue had no objection to the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A). Subsequently, the assessee settled the dispute with the department under the Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme and obtained a certificate.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to settlement under the Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH, Honble & Dr.SHRI ARJUN LAL SAINI, Honble
PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMEBER:
This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-1, Vadodara hereinafter referred as “Ld.CIT(A)” dated 31.05.2019 for the assessment year (AY) 2013-14. 2. This appeal came up hearing on 15th April 2021. The assessee has already filed application dated 05.04.2021 contending therein that the assessee has settled dispute with the Department under Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme–2020 and had already received Form-3, vide Certificate No.804518060111220 issued from the office of Principal
Shri Girish B. Agarwal [L/h of Babulal B. Agrawal Patel Falia] Vs. ITO, Ward-2(5), Bharuch. / ITA No.386/SRT/2019 for A.Y. 2013-14 Commissioner of Income Tax, Surat-1, dated 11.12.2020 copy of which is filed. The assessee through application requested for withdrawal of appeal.
The ld.Departmental Representative /Sr.DR appearing for the Revenue has no objection if the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Considering the contents of the application filed by the assessee, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn being settled. Resultantly, the appeal of the Assessee is dismissed. The AO is directed to pass consequential order as per CBDT Circular No.3/2021 dated 04.03.2021. Order pronounced on 15th April 2021 at the time of hearing of appeal. (Dr.ARJUN LAL SAINI) (PAWAN SINGH) (लेखा सद"य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) ("याियक सद"य/JUDICIAL MEMBER) सुरत/ Surat, "दनांक Dated: 15th April 2021/#SGR Copy of order sent to- Assessee/AO/Pr. CIT/ CIT (A)/ ITAT (DR)/Guard file of ITAT. By order / // /
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026