INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(3)(1), SURAT vs. SHRI BHARATBHAI JEARAMBHAI DANKHARA, SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT noted that the tax effect was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 for filing appeals. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2013-14. The tax effect involved in the appeal was Rs. 48,96,779/-.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed due to the tax effect being below the prescribed monetary limit as per CBDT circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not Applicable
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH, Honble & Dr.SHRI ARJUN LAL SAINI, Honble
सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of hearing: 15.04.2021 उ�घोषणा क� तार�ख/Pronouncement on: 15.04.2021 आदेश /O R D E R PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMEBER:
1. 1. This appeal by Revenue is directed against the order of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-3, Surat, hereinafter referred as “Ld.CIT(A)”, dated 30.06.2017 for assessment year (AY) 2013-14.
2. At the outset of hearing, the ld.Authorised Representative(AR) of the assessee submits that tax effect involved in the present appeal is only of Rs.48,96,779/- and the appeal is liable to be dismissed in view of the CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019.
ITO, Ward-3(3)(1), Surat Vs. Shri Bharatbhai Jearambhai Dankhara ./ A.Y. 2013-14 3. The Ld.Departmental Representative(DR) for the Revenue submits that the Revenue may be given liberty to get the appeal revive, incase if it is discovered that grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue is covered by any exception clause of CBDT circular dated 20.08.2018.
4. We have considered the contentions of both the parties and perused the orders of Assessing Officer and order passed by Ld.CIT(A). We have noted that the tax effect in this appeal is of Rs.48,96,779/- i.e. which is less than the monetary limit of the Rs.50 lacs as fixed by CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 for filing appeal before the Tribunal. Hence, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed. However, the Revenue is given liberty to get the appeal revive if at later stage it is discovered that grounds raised by the Revenue is covered by any exception clause of circular of CBDT dated 20.08.2018.
5. In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced on 15th April 2021 while hearing the appeal.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026