SHREE MODHESHWARI PETROLEUM,BHARUCH vs. ITO, WARD 1(4), BHARUCH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's intention to withdraw the appeal under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The Departmental Representative did not object to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and filed Form No. 3 to obtain its benefits. The assessee subsequently prayed for the withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn by the assessee under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH & DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI
O R D E R PER DR. A. L. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: At the outset itself, we note that assessee submitted letter dated 08.04.2021 stating that he has opted the benefit of the “Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020”. A copy of Form No. 3 under ‘the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, filed by the assessee in the Income Tax Department on 05.02.2021 was also placed before the Bench. The assessee, by way of a letter dated 08.04.2021 prayed the Bench for withdrawal of the appeal to which, the learned Departmental Representative (in short “the ld. DR”) did not raise any objection.
We have heard both the parties and gone through the Form No. 3 along with Acknowledgement No.241661790050221, filed by the assessee to obtain the benefit of ‘Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme’ and noted that assessee has prayed for withdrawal of the appeal. The ld. DR for the revenue did not have any objection if the said appeal is withdrawn by the assessee. Consequently, we treat this appeal as withdrawn. The Assessing Officer is directed to pass the consequential order as per CBDT Circular No.03/2021 dated 04.03.2021.
2 ITA.496/SRT/2019/AY.2013-14 Shree Modheshwari Petroleum 3. In the result, the appeal of the assessee (in AY.2013-14) is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 23/04/2021 at the time of Virtual Court Hearing.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026