ESSEMM FINCAP LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(2), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessees to withdraw their appeals as they had opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessees in these three appeals sought to withdraw their cases. They had opted to avail the 'Vivad Se Viswas' scheme and had filed the necessary forms.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessees should be allowed to withdraw their appeals to avail the Vivad Se Viswas scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCH “B”, HYDERABAD
Before: SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI & SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY
PER A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, A.M:
All these three appeals are filed by the assessees, aggrieved by the orders of the respective Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Hyderabad.
All the above mentioned assessees have filed written submissions before us seeking withdrawal of their appeals as they have opted to avail ‘Vivad Se Viswas’ scheme. It is further submitted that the assessees have filed Form No.1 & 2 in all these cases and also received Form-3 from the Revenue in certain cases. Hence, it is prayed in the written submissions that the appeals of the respective assessees may be allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
The Ld. DR conceded to the request of the assessees and their Counsels.
Having heard both the parties through video conference, We are inclined to allow the appeals of the assessees to be withdrawn yielding to the prayer of the Ld. ARs as the assessees have preferred to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme by filing Form No.1, 2 in all the instant cases and in some cases the assessees have also received Form No-3 from the Revenue. The Ld. DR has also conceded to the request of the Ld. ARs. Accordingly, We hereby dismiss the appeals of the assessees as withdrawn. However, we also make it clear that, if any of the assessee’s cases are not accepted in the Vivad-Se-Viswas scheme by the Revenue for whatsoever may be the reason, then the respective assessees shall be at liberty to file Miscellaneous Petitions before the Tribunal within the time limit prescribed under the Act to reinstate their appeal. It is ordered accordingly.
In the result, all the above-mentioned appeals of the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn.
Pronounced in the open Court on the second February, 2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026