AGARVANSHI HOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED,SECUNDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal as withdrawn because the assessee chose to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme. The assessee retains the liberty to seek reinstatement if the scheme is not accepted.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for AY 2013-14. The assessee subsequently opted to avail the 'Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020' and filed necessary forms.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for a settlement scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCHES “B”: HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
PER BENCH: This assessee’s appeal for AY 2013-14 is directed against the CIT(A) - 1, Hyderabad’s order, dated 09/07/2018 passed in case No. 0105/CIT(A) – 1/2017- 18/2018-19 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) rws 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ; in short “the Act”.
:- 2 -: ITA No. 1937/Hyd/18 Agarvanshi Housing Pvt. Ltd., Sec’bad.
At the outset, ld. counsel for the assessee requested the Bench for permission to withdraw assessee’s appeal as the assessee has opted to avail ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020’ and had filed Form No. 1 & 2 and Form 3 is awaiting to receive from the Revenue.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we are inclined to dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn since the assessee has preferred to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme by filing Form No.1 & 2 and Form-3 is awaiting to receive from the Revenue. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn. However, we also make it clear that, if the assessee's case is not accepted in the Vivad-Se-Viswas scheme by the Revenue for whatsoever may be the reason, then assessee shall be at liberty to file Miscellaneous Petitions before the Tribunal within the time limit prescribed under the Act to reinstate its appeal.
:- 3 -: ITA No. 1937/Hyd/18 Agarvanshi Housing Pvt. Ltd., Sec’bad.
In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed in above terms. Pronounced in the open court on 25th February, 2021. (S.S. GODARA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Hyderabad, Dated: 25th February, 2021. kv copy to : 1 Agarvanshi Housing Pvt. Ltd., C/o. M. Anandam & Co., CAs, Flat No. 7A, Surya Towers, Road, Secunderabad – 500 003. 2 Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle – 1(1), Hyderabad. 3 CIT(A) - 1, Hyderabad Pr. CIT - 1, Hyderabad 4 ITAT, DR, Hyderabad. 5 6 Guard File.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026