DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-17(1), HYDERABAD vs. FORTUNE INFRA DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal as the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Viswas scheme. However, liberty was granted to the Revenue to seek reinstatement if the scheme's benefit was not accepted for the assessee.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2009-10. The assessee opted for the Vivad Se Viswas scheme and filed the necessary forms, which were accepted by the Revenue.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Viswas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCH “A”, HYDERABAD
This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-5, Hyderabad in appeal No. 0141/2015-16/CIT(A)-5, dated 21/08/2018 passed U/s. 143(3) r.w.s 147 and U/s. 250(6) of the Act for the A.Y. 2009-10.
At the outset, Ld. AR submitted before us that the assessee has opted to avail ‘Vivad Se Viswas’ scheme in the appeal of the Revenue. The Ld. AR further submitted that the assessee had filed Form No.1 & 2 and also received Form-3 from the Revenue. It was therefore pleaded, that the instant appeal of the Revenue may be dismissed.
The Ld. DR submitted before us that the Department has no objection if the assessee desires to opt Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme. He further submitted that if the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed then liberty may be granted to reinstate the present appeal of the Revenue if the application filed by the assessee for availing the benefit under Vivad- se-Vishwas scheme is not accepted by the Revenue subsequently.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, We are inclined to dismiss the appeal of the Revenue since the assessee has preferred to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme by filing Form No.1 & 2 and also received Form-3 from the Revenue. Accordingly, We hereby dismiss the instant appeal of the Revenue. However, We also make it clear that, if the assessee’s case is not accepted in the Vivad-Se-Viswas scheme by the Revenue for whatsoever may be the reason, then the Revenue, as requested by the Ld. D.R, shall be at liberty to file Miscellaneous Petition before the Tribunal within the time limit prescribed under the Act to reinstate its appeal. It is ordered accordingly.
In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Pronounced in the open Court on 19th April, 2021.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026