PHI SEEDS PVT. LTD.,HYDERABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, SPECIAL RANGE- 7 , NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the denial of exemption for agricultural income. It found that the assessee did not perform basic agricultural operations like tilling and sowing, and the income was derived from procurement of seeds rather than from the land itself.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a subsidiary of a US company, claimed exemption for agricultural income derived from procuring, processing, and selling seeds. The Assessing Officer (AO) and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) denied this exemption, holding that the assessee's activities did not constitute basic agricultural operations.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's activities of procuring, processing, and selling seeds qualify as agricultural operations for exemption under Section 10(1) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Raja Benoy Kumar Sahas Roy132 citing32 ITR 460 · 1957 · SC
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH, ‘T’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER [Assessment Year: 2013-14] Corteva Agriscience Seeds Private Limited (Formerly known as PHI Seeds Private Limited), V-Ascends, Atria Block, 12th Floor, Plot No.17, Software Units Layout, Madhapur, Hyderabad Telangana, 500081 PAN-AACCP3920F Special Range-7, Room No.211, C.R. Building, Delhi-110002 Revenue [Assessment Year: 2014-15] Corteva Agriscience Seeds Private Limited (Formerly known as PHI Seeds Private Limited), V-Ascends, Atria Block, 12th Floor, Plot No.17, Software Units Layout, Madhapur, Hyderabad Telangana, 500081 PAN-AACCP3920F Special Range-7, Room No.211, C.R. Building, Delhi-110002 Revenue [Assessment Year: 2015-16] Corteva Agriscience Seeds Private Limited (Formerly known as PHI Seeds Private Limited), V-Ascends, Atria Block, 12th Floor, Plot No.17, Software Units Layout, Madhapur, Hyderabad Telangana, 500081 PAN-AACCP3920F Assessee Vs Additional Com
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(1)
- Sharma Dharmendra Gorakhnath HUF, Shrirampur vs ITO WD 2 Ahmednahar, ITO AhmednagarITA 1156/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Prafulldan Motising Gadhvi, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward 4(2)(1) Ahmedabad, Pratyaksha Kar…ITA 2589/AHD/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Pramod Dwivedi, Raipur vs ITO, Ward-1(2), RaipurITA 597/RPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sukhveer Singh Dhilow, Ashoknagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ashok NagarITA 373/AGR/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Yeddula Venkata Narayana Reddy, Bellary vs ITO, Ward1 & Tps, HospetITA 415/BANG/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026