DAMYANTIBEN PRAVINCHANDRA MANSETA,AMRELI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(4), AMRELI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal considered the assessee's submission and application for withdrawal of the appeal. The Tribunal allowed the request for withdrawal in accordance with the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT for Assessment Year 2011-12. The assessee subsequently filed a withdrawal application, stating they had opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal should be withdrawn to avail the benefits of the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Amarji Singh
Revenue by: Shri S.S. Rathi, Sr. D.R. Assessee by: Withdrawal Application Date of hearing : 11-11-2021 Date of pronouncement : 18-11-2021 आदेश/ORDER PER : AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:-
This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2011-12, arises from order of the CIT(A)-3, Rajkot dated 19-09-2017, in proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”.
The assessee filed written submission to withdraw the appeal on the ground that he has opted to avail benefits of Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. When the matter was called for hearing, the ld. counsel for the assessee at the outset has submitted that he does not want to pursue the said appeal and requested that his application for withdrawal of appeal may please be granted.
Page No 2 Damyantiben Pravinchandra Manseta vs. ITO
The ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue stated that he has no objection to withdraw the appeal in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee.
We have considered the submission and application of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal. A reference has been made in sub-section (2) & (3) of section 4 of Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 for the purpose of withdrawal of appeal. In the light of the provision made in the scheme and after considering the material on record, the aforesaid request for withdrawal of appeal of the assessee to avail the VSV Scheme, 2020 in accordance with law is allowed. However, in case, any issue is remained un-resolved under the said scheme, then, the assessee will be at liberty to file the Miscellaneous Application to recall this order to restore the original appeal within the time limit provided in the act.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 18-11-2021
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026