SHASHANK SAGAR SIDDAM,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-14(1), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessees to withdraw their appeals, acknowledging their decision to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessees desired to withdraw their appeals as they had opted for the 'Vivad Se Viswas' scheme. They had filed the necessary forms and received acknowledgment from the Revenue.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessees should be allowed to withdraw their appeals to pursue settlement under the Vivad Se Viswas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCH “B”, HYDERABAD
Both the captioned appeals are filed by the assessees. Ld. CIT(A)-6, Hyderabad in appeal No. 10771/2018-19/A2/CIT(A)-6, dated 30/07/2020 passed U/s. 144 r.w.s 147 and U/s. 250(6) of the Act for the A.Y. 2009-10. is filed against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-6, Hyderabad in appeal No. 0071/2016-17/A3 CIT(A)-6, dated 4/3/2019 passed U/s. 144 r.w.s 250(6) of the Act for the A.Y. 2013-14.
At the outset, Ld.AR submitted before us that both the assessees desire to withdraw their respective appeals as the assessees have opted to avail ‘Vivad Se Viswas’ scheme. He further submitted that the assessees had filed Form No.1 & 2 and also received Form-3 from the Revenue. It was therefore pleaded, that the instant appeals of the assessees may be allowed to be withdrawn.
The Ld. DR conceded to the request of the Ld.AR.
Having heard both the parties through video conference, We are inclined to allow the appeals of the assessees to be withdrawn yielding to the prayer of the Ld. AR as the assessees in the present appeals have preferred to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme by filing Forms No.1, 2 and also received Form No.3 from the Revenue. The Ld. DR has also conceded to the request of the Ld. AR. Accordingly, We hereby dismiss both the appeals of the assessees as withdrawn. However, we also make it clear that, if the assessee/s case/s are not accepted in the Vivad-Se- Viswas scheme by the Revenue for whatsoever may be the reason, then the assessee/s shall be at liberty to file a Miscellaneous Petition/s before the Tribunal within the time limit prescribed under the Act to reinstate their respective appeal/s. It is ordered accordingly.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pronounced in the open Court on the 26th April, 2021.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026